Paper detail

The Lifetimes and Evolution of Molecular Cloud Cores

We discuss the lifetimes and evolution of clumps and cores formed as turbulent density fluctuations in nearly isothermal molecular clouds. In the non-magnetic case, clumps are unlikely to reach a hydrostatic state, and instead are expected to either proceed directly to collapse, or else ``rebound'' towards the mean pressure and density of the parent cloud. Rebounding clumps are delayed in their re-expansion by their self-gravity. From a simple virial calculation, we find re-expansion times of a few free-fall times. In the magnetic case, we present a series of driven-turbulence, ideal-MHD isothermal numerical simulations in which we follow the evolution of clumps and cores in relation to the magnetic criticality of their ``parent clouds'' (the numerical boxes). In subcritical boxes, magnetostatic clumps do not form. A few moderately-gravitationally bound clumps form which however are dispersed by the turbulence in < 1.3 Myr. An estimate of the ambipolar diffusion (AD) time scale t_AD in these cores gives t_AD > 1.3 Myr, only slightly longer than the dynamical times. In supercritical boxes, some cores become locally supercritical and collapse in typical times ~ 1 Myr. We also observe longer-lived supercritical cores that however do not collapse because they are smaller than the local Jeans length. Fewer clumps and cores form in these simulations than in their non-magnetic counterpart. Our results suggest that a) A fraction of the cores may not form stars, and may correspond to some of the observed starless cores. b) Cores may be out-of-equilibrium structures, rather than quasi-magnetostatic ones. c) The magnetic field may help reduce the star formation efficiency by reducing the probability of core formation, rather than by significantly delaying the collapse of individual cores.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.