Paper detail

The Lick-Carnegie Exoplanet Survey: A Uranus-mass Fourth Planet for GJ 876 in an Extrasolar Laplace Configuration

(Abreviated) Continued radial velocity monitoring of the nearby M4V red dwarf star GJ~876 with Keck/HIRES has revealed the presence of a Uranus-mass fourth planetary companion in the system. The new planet has a mean period of $P_e=126.6$ days (over the 12.6-year baseline of the radial velocity observations), and a minimum mass of $m_e\sin{i_e}=12.9\pm 1.7\,M_{\oplus}$. Self-consistent, N-body fits to the radial velocity data set show that the four-planet system has an invariable plane with an inclination relative to the plane of the sky of $i=59.5^{\circ}$. The fit is not significantly improved by the introduction of a mutual inclination between the planets ``b'' and ``c,'' but the new data do confirm a non-zero eccentricity, $e_d=0.207\pm0.055$ for the innermost planet, ``d.'' In our best-fit coplanar model, the mass of the new component is $m_e=14.6\pm1.7\,M_{\oplus}$. Our best-fitting model places the new planet in a 3-body resonance with the previously known giant planets (which have mean periods of $P_c=30.4$ and $P_b=61.1$ days). The critical argument, $φ_{\rm Laplace}=λ_c-3λ_b+2λ_e$, for the Laplace resonance librates with an amplitude of $Δφ_{\rm Laplace}=40\pm13^{\circ}$ about $φ_{\rm Laplace}=0^{\circ}$. Numerical integration indicates that the four-planet system is stable for at least a billion years (at least for the coplanar cases). This resonant configuration of three giant planets orbiting an M-dwarf primary differs from the well-known Laplace configuration of the three inner Galilean satellites of Jupiter, which are executing very small librations about $φ_{\rm Laplace}=180^{\circ}$, and which never experience triple conjunctions. The GJ~876 system, by contrast, comes close to a triple conjunction between the outer three planets once per every orbit of the outer planet, ``e.''

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.