Paper detail

The least common multiple of consecutive arithmetic progression terms

Let $k\ge 0,a\ge 1$ and $b\ge 0$ be integers. We define the arithmetic function $g_{k,a,b}$ for any positive integer $n$ by $g_{k,a,b}(n):=\frac{(b+na)(b+(n+1)a)...(b+(n+k)a)} {{\rm lcm}(b+na,b+(n+1)a,...,b+(n+k)a)}.$ Letting $a=1$ and $b=0$, then $g_{k,a,b}$ becomes the arithmetic function introduced previously by Farhi. Farhi proved that $g_{k,1,0}$ is periodic and that $k!$ is a period. Hong and Yang improved Farhi's period $k!$ to ${\rm lcm}(1,2,...,k)$ and conjectured that $\frac{{\rm lcm}(1,2,...,k,k+1)}{k+1}$ divides the smallest period of $g_{k,1,0}$. Recently, Farhi and Kane proved this conjecture and determined the smallest period of $g_{k,1,0}$. For the general integers $a\ge 1$ and $b\ge 0$, it is natural to ask the interesting question: Is $g_{k,a,b}$ periodic? If so, then what is the smallest period of $g_{k,a,b}$? We first show that the arithmetic function $g_{k,a,b}$ is periodic. Subsequently, we provide detailed $p$-adic analysis of the periodic function $g_{k,a,b}$. Finally, we determine the smallest period of $g_{k,a,b}$. Our result extends the Farhi-Kane theorem from the set of positive integers to general arithmetic progressions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.