Paper detail

The layer number of $α$-evenly distributed point sets

For a finite point set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we consider a peeling process where the vertices of the convex hull are removed at each step. The layer number $L(X)$ of a given point set $X$ is defined as the number of steps of the peeling process in order to delete all points in $X$. It is known that if $X$ is a set of random points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, then the expectation of $L(X)$ is $Θ(|X|^{2/(d+1)})$, and recently it was shown that if $X$ is a point set of the square grid on the plane, then $L(X)=Θ(|X|^{2/3})$. In this paper, we investigate the layer number of $α$-evenly distributed point sets for $α>1$; these point sets share the regularity aspect of random point sets but in a more general setting. The set of lattice points is also an $α$-evenly distributed point set for some $α>1$. We find an upper bound of $O(|X|^{3/4})$ for the layer number of an $α$-evenly distributed point set $X$ in a unit disk on the plane for some $α>1$, and provide an explicit construction that shows the growth rate of this upper bound cannot be improved. In addition, we give an upper bound of $O(|X|^{\frac{d+1}{2d}})$ for the layer number of an $α$-evenly distributed point set $X$ in a unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^d$ for some $α>1$ and $d\geq 3$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.