Paper detail

The Last Eight-Billion Years of Intergalactic CIV Evolution

We surveyed the HST UV spectra of 49 low-redshift quasars for z < 1 CIV candidates, relying solely on the characteristic wavelength separation of the doublet. After consideration of the defining traits of CIV doublets (e.g., consistent line profiles, other associated transitions, etc.), we defined a sample of 38 definite (group G = 1) and five likely (G = 2) doublets with rest equivalent widths W_r for both lines detected at >= 3 sigma. We conducted Monte-Carlo completeness tests to measure the unblocked redshift (dz) and co-moving pathlength (dX) over which we were sensitive to CIV doublets of a range of equivalent widths and column densities. The absorber line density of (G = 1+2) doublets is dN/dX = 4.1+0.7/-0.6 for log N(C^+3) >= 13.2, and dN/dX has not evolved significantly since z = 5. The best-fit power-law to the G = 1 frequency distribution of column densities f(N(C^+3)) = k(N(C^+3)/N_0)^alpha_N has coefficient k = (0.67+0.18/-0.16) x 10^-14 cm^2 and exponent alpha_N = -1.50+0.17/-0.19, where N_0 = 10^14 cm^-2. Using the power-law model of f(N(C^+3)), we measured the C^+3 mass density relative to the critical density: Omega(C^+3) = (6.20+1.82/-1.52) x 10^-8 for 13 <= log N(C^+3) <= 15. This value is a 2.8+/-0.7 increase in Omega(C^+3) compared to the error-weighted mean from several 1 < z < 5 surveys for CIV absorbers. A simple linear regression to Omega(C^+3) over the age of the Universe indicates that Omega(C^+3) has slowly but steadily increased from z = 5 --> 0, with dOmega(C^+3)/dt_age = (0.42+/-0.2) x 10^-8 Gyr^-1.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.