Paper detail

The Large Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC 2214

Johnson {\it BV} CCD observations have been made of the young Large Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC~2214 and a nearby field using the Anglo-Australian Telescope. It has been suggested in the literature that this elliptical cluster is actually two clusters in the process of merging. No evidence is found from profile fitting or the colour--magnitude diagrams to support this contention. Completeness factors are estimated for the CCD frames. These values are used in conjunction with luminosity functions to estimate the initial mass function (IMF) for NGC~2214. A power law is assumed for the IMF, with a good fit being found for the exponent (1 + $x$) = 2.01~$\pm$ 0.09. There is some indication that the low-mass end (less than or equal to 3 Solar Masses) has a lower gradient than the high-mass end of the derived IMF. This value is in reasonable agreement with literature values for other Magellanic IMFs, and not substantially different from those of the poorly determined Galactic IMFs, suggesting the possibility of a `universal' IMF over the Magellanic Clouds and our Galaxy in the mass range $\sim 1$ to $\sim 10$ Solar Masses.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.