Paper detail

The $L - σ$ relation for massive bursts of star formation

The validity of the emission line luminosity vs. ionised gas velocity dispersion ($L - σ$) correlation for HII galaxies (HIIGx), and its potential as an accurate distance estimator are assessed. For a sample of 128 local ($0.02\lesssim z\lesssim 0.2$) compact HIIGx with high equivalent widths of their Balmer emission lines we obtained ionised gas velocity dispersion from high S/N high-dispersion spectroscopy (Subaru-HDS and ESO VLT-UVES) and integrated H$β$ fluxes from low dispersion wide aperture spectrophotometry. We find that the $L - σ$ relation is strong and stable against restrictions in the sample (mostly based on the emission line profiles). The `gaussianity' of the profile is important for reducing the rms uncertainty of the distance indicator, but at the expense of substantially reducing the sample. By fitting other physical parameters into the correlation we are able to significantly decrease the scatter without reducing the sample. The size of the starforming region is an important second parameter, while adding the emission line equivalent width or the continuum colour and metallicity, produces the solution with the smallest rms scatter=$δ\log L(\mathrm{H}β) = 0.233$. The derived coefficients in the best $L - σ$ relation are very close to what is expected from virialized ionising clusters, while the derived sum of the stellar and ionised gas masses are similar to the dynamical mass estimated using the HST corrected Petrosian radius. These results are compatible with gravity being the main mechanism causing the broadening of the emission lines in these very young and massive clusters. The derived masses range from about 2 $\times10^6$ $\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ to $10^9$ $\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and their `corrected' Petrosian radius, from a few tens to a few hundred parsecs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.