Paper detail

The L - σ relation for HII galaxies in green

The correlation between emission-line luminosity (L) and profile width (sigma) for HII Galaxies provides a powerful method to measure the distances to galaxies over a wide range of redshifts. In this paper we use SDSS spectrophotometry to explore the systematics of the correlation using the [OIII]5007 lines instead of Halpha or Hbeta to measure luminosities and line widths. We also examine possible systematic effects involved in measuring the profile-widths and the luminosities through different apertures. We find that the green L-sigma relation defined using [OIII]5007 luminosities is significantly more sensitive than Hbeta to the effects of age and the physical conditions of the nebulae, which more than offsets the advantage of the higher strength of the [OIII]5007 lines. We then explore the possibility of mixing [OIII]5007 profile-widths with SDSS Hbeta luminosities using the Hubble constant H0 to quantify the possible systematic effects. We find the mixed L(Hbeta) sigma[OIII] relation to be at least as powerful as the canonical L-sigma relation as a distance estimator, and we show that the evolutionary corrections do not change the slope and the scatter of the correlation, and therefore, do not bias the L-sigma distance indicator at high redshifts. Locally, however, the luminosities of the Giant HII Regions that provide the zero-point calibrators are sensitive to evolutionary corrections and may bias the Hubble constant if their mean ages, as measured by the equivalent widths of Hbeta, are significantly different from the mean age of the HII Galaxies. Using a small sample of 16 ad-hoc zero point calibrators we obtain a value of H0 = 66.4\pm4.5 km s^-1 Mpc^-1 for the Hubble constant, which is fully consistent with the best modern determinations, and that is not biased by evolutionary corrections.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.