Paper detail

The kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal from inhomogeneous reionization: a parameter space study

[ABRIDGED] Inhomogeneous reionization acts as a source of arcminute-scale anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the most important of which is the kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect. Observational efforts with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) are poised to detect this signal for the first time. Indeed, recent SPT measurements place a bound on the dimensionless kSZ power spectrum around a multipole of l=3000 of P_tot < 2.8 (6) micro K^2 at 95% C.L., by ignoring (allowing) correlations between the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (tSZ) effect and the cosmic infrared background (CIB). To interpret these and upcoming observations, we compute the kSZ signal from a suite of ~ 100 reionization models using the publicly available code 21cmFAST. Our physically motivated reionization models are parameterized by the ionizing efficiency of high-redshift galaxies, the minimum virial temperature of halos capable of hosting stars, and the ionizing photon mean free path. We predict the contribution of patchy reionization to be P_patchy = 1.5-3.5 micro K^2. Therefore, even when conservatively adopting a low estimate of the post-reionization signal, P_OV ~ 2 micro K^2, none of our models are consistent with the aggressive 2sigma SPT bound that does not include correlations. This implies that either: (i) the early stages of reionization occurred in a much more homogeneous manner than suggested by the stellar-driven scenarios we explore, such as would be the case if, e.g., very high energy X-rays or exotic particles contributed significantly; and/or (ii) that there is a significant correlation between the CIB and the tSZ. On the other hand, the conservative SPT bound is compatible with all of our models, and is on the boarder of constraining reionization.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.