Paper detail

The Key Player Problem in Complex Oscillator Networks and Electric Power Grids: Resistance Centralities Identify Local Vulnerabilities

Identifying key players in a set of coupled individual systems is a fundamental problem in network theory. Its origin can be traced back to social sciences and led to ranking algorithms based on graph theoretic centralities. Coupled dynamical systems differ from social networks in that, they are characterized by degrees of freedom with a deterministic dynamics and the coupling between individual units is a well-defined function of those degrees of freedom. One therefore expects the resulting coupled dynamics, and not only the network topology, to also determine the key players. Here, we investigate synchronizable network-coupled dynamical systems such as high voltage electric power grids and coupled oscillators. We search for nodes which, once perturbed by a local noisy disturbance, generate the largest overall transient excursion away from synchrony. A spectral decomposition of the coupling matrix leads to an elegant, concise, yet accurate solution to this identification problem. We show that, when the internodal coupling matrix is Laplacian, these key players are peripheral in the sense of a centrality measure defined from effective resistance distances. For linearly coupled dynamical systems such as weakly loaded power grids or consensus algorithms, the nodal ranking is efficiently obtained through a single Laplacian matrix inversion, regardless of the operational synchronous state. We call the resulting ranking index LRank. For heavily loaded power grids or coupled oscillators systems closer to the transition to synchrony, nonlinearities render the nodal ranking dependent on the synchronous state. In this case a weighted Laplacian matrix inversion gives another ranking index, which we call WLRank. Quite surprisingly, we find that LRank provides a faithful ranking even for well developed coupling nonlinearities, corresponding to oscillator angle differences up to $40^o$ approximately.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.