Paper detail

The Kepler Peas in a Pod Pattern is Astrophysical

\Kepler\ planets around a given star have similar sizes to each other and regular orbital spacing, like "peas in a pod." Several studies have tested whether detection bias could produce this apparent pattern by resampling planet radii at random and applying a sensitivity function analogous to that of the Kepler spacecraft. However, \citet{Zhu2019} argues that this pattern is not astrophysical but an artifact of Kepler's discovery efficiency at the detection threshold. To support this claim, their new analysis samples the transit signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to derive a synthetic population of bootstrapped planet radii. Here, we examine the procedure of sampling transit SNR and demonstrate it is not applicable. Sampling transit SNR does not set up random, independent planet radii, and so it is unsuitable for corroborating (or falsifying) detection bias as the origin of apparent patterns in planet radius. By sampling the planet radii directly and using a simple model for Kepler's sensitivity, we rule out detection bias as the source of the peas-in-a-pod pattern with $>10$-$σ$ confidence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.