Paper detail

The $k$-resultant modulus set problem on algebraic varieties over finite fields

We study the $k$-resultant modulus set problem in the $d$-dimensional vector space $\mathbb F_q^d$ over the finite field $\mathbb F_q$ with $q$ elements. Given $E\subset \mathbb F_q^d$ and an integer $k\ge 2$, the $k$-resultant modulus set, denoted by $Δ_k(E)$, is defined as $$ Δ_k(E)=\{\|x^1\pm x^2 \pm \cdots \pm x^k\|\in \mathbb F_q: x^j\in E, ~j=1,2,\ldots, k\},$$ where $\|α\|=α_1^2+\cdots+ α_d^2$ for $α=(α_1, \ldots, α_d) \in \mathbb F_q^d.$ In this setting, the $k$-resultant modulus set problem is to determine the minimal cardinality of $E\subset \mathbb F_q^d$ such that $Δ_k(E) = \mathbb F_q$ or $\mathbb{F}_q^*$. This problem is an extension of the Erdős-Falconer distance problem. In particular, we investigate the $k$-resultant modulus set problem with the restriction that the set $E\subset \mathbb F_q^d$ is contained in a specific algebraic variety. Energy estimates play a crucial role in our proof.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.