Paper detail

The $k$-essence scalar field in the context of Supernova Ia Observations

A $k$-essence scalar field model having (non canonical) Lagrangian of the form $L=-V(ϕ)F(X)$ where $X=1/2g^{μν}\nabla_μϕ\nabla_νϕ$ with constant $V(ϕ)$ is shown to be consistent with luminosity distance-redshift data observed for type Ia Supernova. For constant $V(ϕ)$, $F(X)$ satisfies a scaling relation which is used to set up a differential equation involving the Hubble parameter $H$, the scale factor $a$ and the $k$-essence field $ϕ$. $H$ and $a$ are extracted from SNe Ia data and using the differential equation the time dependence of the field $ϕ$ is found to be: $ϕ(t) \sim λ_0 + λ_1 t + λ_2 t^2$. The constants $λ_i$ have been determined. The time dependence is similar to that of the quintessence scalar field (having canonical kinetic energy) responsible for homogeneous inflation. Furthermore, the scaling relation and the obtained time dependence of the field $ϕ$ is used to determine the $X$-dependence of the function $F(X)$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.