Paper detail

The $k$-error linear complexity distribution for $2^n$-periodic binary sequences

The linear complexity and the $k$-error linear complexity of a sequence have been used as important security measures for key stream sequence strength in linear feedback shift register design. By studying the linear complexity of binary sequences with period $2^n$, one could convert the computation of $k$-error linear complexity into finding error sequences with minimal Hamming weight. Based on Games-Chan algorithm, the $k$-error linear complexity distribution of $2^n$-periodic binary sequences is investigated in this paper. First, for $k=2,3$, the complete counting functions on the $k$-error linear complexity of $2^n$-periodic balanced binary sequences (with linear complexity less than $2^n$) are characterized. Second, for $k=3,4$, the complete counting functions on the $k$-error linear complexity of $2^n$-periodic binary sequences with linear complexity $2^n$ are presented. Third, as a consequence of these results, the counting functions for the number of $2^n$-periodic binary sequences with the $k$-error linear complexity for $k = 2$ and 3 are obtained. Further more, an important result in a recent paper is proved to be not completely correct.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.