The (k,ℓ)(k,\ell)-proper index of graphs

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

A tree TT in an edge-colored graph is called a {\it proper tree} if no two adjacent edges of TT receive the same color. Let GG be a connected graph of order nn and kk be an integer with 2≤k≤n2\leq k \leq n. For S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) and ∣S∣≥2|S| \ge 2, an SS-tree is a tree containing the vertices of SS in GG. Suppose {T1,T2,…,Tℓ}\{T_1,T_2,\ldots,T_\ell\} is a set of SS-trees, they are called \emph{internally disjoint} if E(Ti)∩E(Tj)=∅E(T_i)\cap E(T_j)=\emptyset and V(Ti)∩V(Tj)=SV(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S for 1≤i≠j≤ℓ1\leq i\neq j\leq \ell. For a set SS of kk vertices of GG, the maximum number of internally disjoint SS-trees in GG is denoted by κ(S)κ(S). The κκ-connectivity κk(G)κ_k(G) of GG is defined by κk(G)=min⁡{κ(S)∣Sκ_k(G)=\min\{κ(S)\mid S is a kk-subset of V(G)}V(G)\}. For a connected graph GG of order nn and for two integers kk and ℓ\ell with 2≤k≤n2\le k\le n and 1≤ℓ≤κk(G)1\leq \ell \leq κ_k(G), the \emph{(k,ℓ)(k,\ell)-proper index pxk,ℓ(G)px_{k,\ell}(G)} of GG is the minimum number of colors that are needed in an edge-coloring of GG such that for every kk-subset SS of V(G)V(G), there exist ℓ\ell internally disjoint proper SS-trees connecting them. In this paper, we show that for every pair of positive integers kk and ℓ\ell with k≥3k \ge 3, there exists a positive integer N1=N1(k,ℓ)N_1=N_1(k,\ell) such that pxk,ℓ(Kn)=2px_{k,\ell}(K_n) = 2 for every integer n≥N1n \ge N_1, and also there exists a positive integer N2=N2(k,ℓ)N_2=N_2(k,\ell) such that pxk,ℓ(Km,n)=2px_{k,\ell}(K_{m,n}) = 2 for every integer n≥N2n \ge N_2 and m=O(nr)(r≥1)m=O(n^r) (r \ge 1). In addition, we show that for every p≥clog⁡annkp \ge c\sqrt[k]{\frac{\log_a n}{n}} (c≥5c \ge 5), pxk,ℓ(Gn,p)≤2px_{k,\ell}(G_{n,p})\le 2 holds almost surely, where Gn,pG_{n,p} is the Erdös-Rényi random graph model.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.