Paper detail

The Isomorphism Problem for omega-Automatic Trees

The main result of this paper is that the isomorphism for omega-automatic trees of finite height is at least has hard as second-order arithmetic and therefore not analytical. This strengthens a recent result by Hjorth, Khoussainov, Montalban, and Nies showing that the isomorphism problem for omega-automatic structures is not $Σ^1_2$. Moreover, assuming the continuum hypothesis CH, we can show that the isomorphism problem for omega-automatic trees of finite height is recursively equivalent with second-order arithmetic. On the way to our main results, we show lower and upper bounds for the isomorphism problem for omega-automatic trees of every finite height: (i) It is decidable ($Π^0_1$-complete, resp,) for height 1 (2, resp.), (ii) $Π^1_1$-hard and in $Π^1_2$ for height 3, and (iii) $Π^1_{n-3}$- and $Σ^1_{n-3}$-hard and in $Π^1_{2n-4}$ (assuming CH) for all n > 3. All proofs are elementary and do not rely on theorems from set theory.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.