Paper detail

The ISM in O-star spectroscopic surveys: GOSSS, OWN, IACOB, NoMaDS, and CAFÉ-BEANS

I present results on the interstellar medium towards the O stars observed in five optical spectroscopic surveys: GOSSS, OWN, IACOB, NoMaDS, and CAFÉ-BEANS. I have measured both the amount [$E(4405-5495)$] and type [$R_{5495}$] of extinction towards several hundreds of Galactic O stars and verified that the Maíz Apellániz et al. (2014) family of extinction laws provides a significantly better fit to optical+NIR Galactic extinction than either the Cardelli et al. (1989) or the Fitzpatrick (1999) families. $R_{5495}$ values are concentrated between 3.0 and 3.5 but for low values of $E(4405-5495)$ there is a significant population with larger $R_{5495}$ associated with H II regions. I have also measured different DIBs and I have found that $W$(5797)/$W$(5780) is anticorrelated with $R_{5495}$, a sign that extreme $ζ$ clouds are characterized not only by low ionization environments (as opposed to $σ$ clouds) but also by having a larger fraction of small dust grains. The equivalent width of the "Gaia DIB" (8621 Å) is strongly correlated with $E(4405-5495)$, as expected, and its behavior appears to be more $σ$-like than $ζ$-like. We have also started analyzing some individual sightlines in detail.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.