Paper detail

The iron K line complex in NGC1068: implications for X-ray reflection in the nucleus

We report a new analysis of ASCA data on the iron K line complex in NGC1068. The line complex basically consists of three components, as previously reported. A weak red wing of the 6.4 keV fluoresence iron K line is found. A plausible explanation is Compton scattering in optically thick, cold matter which can be identified with an obscuring torus or cold gas in the host galaxy. We also show that this `Compton shoulder' should be observable with ASCA using a simulated reflection spectrum. In order to explain the two higher energy lines as well as the cold 6.4 keV line, we fit the ASCA data with a composite model of cold and warm reflection. This shows that cold reflection dominates the observed X-ray emission above 4 keV. The two higher energy lines have large equivalent width with respect to the warm-scattered continuum, suggesting that efficient resonant scattering operates. The line energies are systematically lower than those expected from resonant lines for FeXXV and FeXXVI by 100 eV. The redshifts may be due to either the ionized gas of the warm mirror receding at a radial velocity of 4000-5000 km/s, or effects of Compton scattering in a complicated geometry.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.