Paper detail

The Ionizing Photon Production Efficiency ($ξ_{ion}$) Of Lensed Dwarf Galaxies At $z \sim 2 $

We measure the ionizing photon production efficiency ($ξ_{ion}$) of low-mass galaxies ($10^{7.8}$-$10^{9.8}$ $M_{\odot}$) at $1.4<z<2.7$, allowing us to better understand the contribution of dwarf galaxies to the ionizing background and cosmic reionization. We target galaxies that are magnified by the strong lensing galaxy clusters Abell 1689, MACS J0717, and MACS J1149. We utilize Keck/MOSFIRE spectra to measure optical nebular emission line fluxes and HST imaging to measure the rest-UV and rest-optical photometry. We present two methods of stacking. First, we take the average of the log(L$_{Hα}$ /L$_{UV}$) of galaxies in our sample to determine the typical log($ξ_{ion}$). Second, we take the logarithm of the total L$_{Hα}$ over the total L$_{UV}$. We prefer the latter as it provides the total ionizing UV luminosity density of galaxies when multiplied by the non-ionizing UV luminosity density from the UV luminosity function. log($ξ_{ion}$) calculated from the second method is $\sim$ 0.2 dex higher than the first method. We do not find any strong dependence between log($ξ_{ion}$) and stellar mass, M$_{UV}$ or UV spectral slope ($β$). We report a value of log($ξ_{ion}$) $\sim25.47\pm 0.09$ for our UV-complete sample ($-22<M_{UV}<-17.3$) and $\sim25.37\pm0.11$ for our mass-complete sample ($7.8<\log(M_*)<9.8)$. These values are consistent with measurements of more massive, more luminous galaxies in other high-redshift studies that use the same stacking technique. Our log($ξ_{ion}$) is $0.2-0.3$ dex higher than low-redshift galaxies of similar mass, indicating an evolution in the stellar properties, possibly due to metallicity, age, or the prevalence of binary stars. We also find a correlation between log($ξ_{ion}$) and the equivalent widths of H$α$ and [OIII]$λ$5007 fluxes, confirming that these equivalent widths can be used to estimate $ξ_{ion}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.