Paper detail

The ionization structure of multiple shell planetary nebulae: I. NGC 2438

In recent times an increasing number of extended haloes and multiple shells around planetary nebulae have been discovered. These faint extensions to the main nebula trace the mass-loss history of the star, modified by the subsequent evolution of the nebula. Integrated models predict that some haloes may be recombining, and not in ionization equilibrium. But parameters such as the ionization state and thus the contiguous excitation process are not well known. The haloes are very extended, but faint in surface brightness - 10^3 times below the main nebula. The observational limits lead to the need of an extremely well studied main nebula, to model the processes in the shells and haloes of one object. NGC2438 is a perfect candidate to explore the physical characteristics of the halo. Long-slit spectroscopic data were obtained. These data are supplemented by imaging data from the HST archive, and archival VLA observations. The use of diagnostic diagrams draws limits for physical properties in the models. CLOUDY is used to model the nebular properties, and to derive a more accurate distance and ionized mass. We derive an accurate extinction E(B-V)=0.16, and distance of 1.9kpc. This puts the nebula behind the nearby open cluster M46. The low-excitation species are found to be dominated by clumps. The emission line ratios show no evidence for shocks. We find the shell in ionization equilibrium: a significant amount of UV radiation infiltrates the inner nebula. Thus the shell still seems to be ionized. The spatially resolved CLOUDY model supports the hypothesis that photoionization is the dominant process in this nebula, far out into the shell. Previous models predicted that the shell would be recombining, but this is not confirmed by the data. We note that these models used a smaller distance, and therefore different input parameters, than derived by us.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.