Paper detail

The Inversion of the Real Kinematic Properties of Coronal Mass Ejections by Forward Modeling

The kinematic properties of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) suffer from the projection effects, and it is expected that the real velocity should be larger and the real angular width should be smaller than the apparent values. Several attempts have been tried to correct the projection effects, which however led to a too large average velocity probably due to the biased choice of the CME events. In order to estimate the overall influence of the projection effects on the kinematic properties of the CMEs, we perform a forward modeling of the real distributions of the CME properties, such as the velocity, the angular width, and the latitude, by requiring their projected distributions to best match the observations. Such a matching is conducted by Monte Carlo simulations. According to the derived real distributions, it is found that (1) the average real velocity of all non-full-halo CMEs is about 514 km s$^{-1}$, and the average real angular width is about 33$^\circ$, in contrast to the corresponding apparent values of 418 km s$^{-1}$ and 42.7$^\circ$ in observations; (2) For the CMEs with the angular width in the range of $20^\circ- 120^\circ$, the average real velocity is 510 km s$^{-1}$ and the average real angular width is 43.4$^\circ$, in contrast to the corresponding apparent values of 392 km s$^{-1}$ and 52$^\circ$ in observations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.