Paper detail

The inverse cascade and nonlinear alpha-effect in simulations of isotropic helical hydromagnetic turbulence

A numerical model of isotropic homogeneous turbulence with helical forcing is investigated. The resulting flow, which is essentially the prototype of the alpha^2 dynamo of mean-field dynamo theory, produces strong dynamo action with an additional large scale field on the scale of the box (at wavenumber k=1; forcing is at k=5). This large scale field is nearly force-free and exceeds the equipartition value. As the magnetic Reynolds number R_m increases, the saturation field strength and the growth rate of the dynamo increase. However, the time it takes to built up the large scale field from equipartition to its final super-equipartition value increases with magnetic Reynolds number. The large scale field generation can be identified as being due to nonlocal interactions originating from the forcing scale, which is characteristic of the alpha-effect. Both alpha and turbulent magnetic diffusivity eta_t are determined simultaneously using numerical experiments where the mean-field is modified artificially. Both quantities are quenched in a R_m-dependent fashion. The evolution of the energy of the mean field matches that predicted by an alpha^2 dynamo model with similar alpha and eta_t quenchings. For this model an analytic solution is given which matches the results of the simulations. The simulations are numerically robust in that the shape of the spectrum at large scales is unchanged when changing the resolution from 30^3 to 120^3 meshpoints, or when increasing the magnetic Prandtl number (viscosity/magnetic diffusivity) from 1 to 100. Increasing the forcing wavenumber to 30 (i.e. increasing the scale separation) makes the inverse cascade effect more pronounced, although it remains otherwise qualitatively unchanged.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.