Paper detail

The intrinsic shapes of dwarf irregular galaxies

We use the measured B band axial ratios of galaxies from an updated catalog of Local Volume galaxies to determine the intrinsic shape of dwarf irregular galaxies (de Vacouleurs&#39; morphological types 8, 9 and 10). We find that the shapes change systematically with luminosity, with fainter galaxies being thicker. In particular, we divide our sample into sub-samples and find that the most luminous dwarfs (-19.6 < M_B < -14.8) have thin discs (thickness ~ 0.2), with the disc being slightly elliptical (axial ratio ~ 0.8). At intermediate luminosity, viz. -14.8 < M_B < -12.6, the galaxies are still characterized by elliptical discs (axial ratio ~ 0.7), but the discs are somewhat thicker (thickness ~ 0.4). The faintest dwarfs, viz. those with -12.6 < M_B < -6.7 are well described as being oblate spheroids with an axial ratio ~ 0.5. The increasing thickness of the stellar discs of dwarf irregulars with decreasing luminosity is compatible with the increasing ratio of velocity dispersion to rotational velocity with decreasing galaxy size.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.