Paper detail

The internal structure of neutron stars and white dwarfs, and the Jacobi virial equation. II

In a previous paper we have shown that the function Γ(M, EOS)=αβ_{GR}/Λ^{0.9}(R) is constant (~ 0.4) for pre main-sequence stars (PMS), white dwarfs (WD) and for some neutron star (NS) models, where α_{GR} and β_{GR} are the form-factors of the gravitational potential energy and of the moment of inertia. To investigate the structural evolution of another type of celestial bodies, we use the MESA code to extend these calculations to gaseous planets. We show that this function is conserved for all models during the whole planetary evolution and is independent of the planet mass. We also analyse the cases for which this function is not conserved during some stellar evolutionary phases. For the PMS to the WD cooling sequences, we have found a connection between the strong variations of Γ(M, EOS) during the intermediary evolutionary phases and the specific nuclear power. A threshold for the specific nuclear power was determined. Below this limit this function is invariant (~ 0.4) for these models, i.e., at the initial and final stages (PMS and WD). Concerning NS, we study the influence of the equation of state (EOS) on this function and refine the exponent of the auxiliary function Λ(R) to be ~ 0.8. It is shown that the function Γ(M, EOS) is also invariant (~ 0.4) and is independent of the EOS and of the stellar mass. Therefore, we confirm that regardless of the final products of the stellar evolution, NS or WD, they recover the initial value of Γ(M, EOS) ~ 0.4 acquired at the PMS. Finally, we have introduced a macroscopic stability "criterion" for neutron star models based on the properties of the relativistic product αβ_{GR}.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.