Paper detail

The intermediate nebular phase of SN 2014J: onset of clumping as the source of recombination

At the age of about 1 year, the spectra of most Type Ia supernovae are dominated by strong forbidden nebular emission lines of FeII and FeIII. Later observations (at about 2 years) of the nearby SN 2011fe showed an unexpected shift of ionization to FeI and FeII. Spectra of the very nearby SN Ia 2014J at an intermediate phase (1 - 1.5 years) that are presented here show a progressive decline of FeIII emission, while FeI is not yet strong. The decrease in ionization can be explained if the degree of clumping in the ejecta increases significantly at ~1.5 years, at least in the Fe-dominated zone. Models suggest that clumps remain coherent after about one year, behaving like shrapnel. The high density in the clumps, combined with the decreasing heating rate, would then cause recombination. These data may witness the phase of transition from relatively smooth ejecta to the very clumpy morphology that is typical of SN remnants. The origin of the increased clumping may be the development of local magnetic fields.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.