Paper detail

The interleaved multichromatic number of a graph

For $k\ge 1$, we consider interleaved $k$-tuple colorings of the nodes of a graph, that is, assignments of $k$ distinct natural numbers to each node in such a way that nodes that are connected by an edge receive numbers that are strictly alternating between them with respect to the relation $<$. If it takes at least $χ_{int}^k(G)$ distinct numbers to provide graph $G$ with such a coloring, then the interleaved multichromatic number of $G$ is $χ_{int}^*(G)=\inf_{k\ge 1}χ_{int}^k(G)/k$ and is known to be given by a function of the simple cycles of $G$ under acyclic orientations if $G$ is connected [1]. This paper contains a new proof of this result. Unlike the original proof, the new proof makes no assumptions on the connectedness of $G$, nor does it resort to the possible applications of interleaved $k$-tuple colorings and their properties.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.