Paper detail

The Instability of Vacua in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

Owing to the quadratic nature of the theory, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity generically permits two distinct vacuum solutions. One solution (the "Einstein" vacuum) has a well defined limit as the Gauss-Bonnet coupling goes to zero, whereas the other solution (the "stringy" vacuum) does not. There has been some debate regarding the stability of these vacua, most recently from Deser and Tekin who have argued that the corresponding black hole solutions have positive mass and as such both vacua are stable. Whilst the statement about the mass is correct, we argue that the stringy vacuum is still perturbatively unstable. Simply put, the stringy vacuum suffers from a ghost-like instability that is not excited by the spherically symmetric black hole, but would be excited by any source likely to emit gravitational waves, such as a binary system. This result is reliable except in the strongly coupled regime close to the Chern-Simons limit, when the two vacua are almost degenerate. In this regime, we study instanton transitions between branches via bubble nucleation, and calculate the nucleation probability. This demonstrates that there is large mixing between the vacua, so that neither of them can accurately describe the true quantum vacuum. We also present a new gravitational instanton describing black hole pair production in de Sitter space on the Einstein branch, which is preferred to the usual Nariai instantons, and is not present in pure Einstein gravity.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.