Paper detail

The inner view of NGC 1052 using multiple X-ray observations

In this paper, we make a multi-epoch analysis of NGC 1052, one of the prototypical LLAGN, using XMM-Newton, Suzaku and NuSTAR observations, taken from 2001 to 2017. This is the first time that results from NuSTAR observations are reported for NGC 1052. On the technical aspects, we found a wavelength-dependent calibration issue between simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR spectra. It is described by a change on the photon index of $\rm{ Γ_{NuSTAR}- Γ_{XMM-Newton}=0.17\pm0.04}$. We use ancillary Chandra data to decontaminate the nuclear spectrum from circumnuclear contributors. We find that two baseline models can fit the broad (0.5-50 keV) X-ray spectrum of the source. One consists of a power-law like continuum which is absorbed by a uniform absorber, reflection from neutral material, and a separate power-law component in the soft band. The second model presents a clumpy absorber. The reflection component is still present, but not the soft band power-law. Instead, absorption by a warm absorber is necessary to fit the spectra. This is the first time that a reflection component is established in this object, thanks to high energy data from NuSTAR. This component is constant in flux and shape, supporting the idea that is produced away from the central source (probably the torus). We find flux, spectral slope and absorption variations on timescales of months to years. We also find that a patchy-absober can explain the behaviour of this source better as it is $\sim$ 200 times more likely than the uniform absober while it yields to smaller intrinsic variations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.