Paper detail

The initial mass distribution of the M82 star cluster system

We explore whether we can constrain the shape of the INITIAL mass distribution of the star cluster population in M82's ~1 Gyr-old post-starburst region "B", in which the present-day cluster mass function (CMF) is closely approximated by a log-normal distribution. We conclude that the M82 B initial CMF must have had a mean mass very close to that of the "equilibrium" CMF of Vesperini (1998). Consequently, if the presently observed M82 B CMF has remained approximately constant since its formation, as predicted, then the INITIAL CMF must have been characterized by a mean mass that was only slightly larger than the present mean mass. From our detailed analysis of the expected evolution of CMFs, we conclude that our observations of the M82 B CMF are inconsistent with a scenario in which the 1 Gyr-old cluster population originated from an initial power-law mass distribution. Our conclusion is supported by arguments related to the initial density in M82 B, which would have been unphysically high if the present cluster population were the remains of an initial power-law distribution.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.