Paper detail

The inhomogenous reionization of the inter-galactic medium by metal-poor globular clusters

We present detailed radiative transfer simulations of the reionization history of the Milky Way by metal-poor globular clusters. We identify potential metal-poor globular cluster candidates within the Aquarius simulation using dark matter halo velocity dispersions. We calculate the local ionization fields via a photon-conserving, three dimensional non-equilibrium chemistry code and allow the model to propagate through to the present day. The key feature of the model is that globular cluster formation is suppressed if the local gas is ionized. We find that our spatial treatment of the ionization field leads to drastically different numbers and spatial distributions when compared to models where globular cluster formation is simply truncated at a given redshift. We find that it is possible for metal-poor globular clusters to have formed via the dark matter halo formation channel as our secondary model (delayed formation) combined with truncation at z = 10 produces radial distributions statistically consistent with that of the Milky Way metal-poor globular clusters. If globular clusters do indeed form within high-redshift dark matter halos, if only in-part, their contributions to the reionization of the local (i.e. 2^3 h^-3 Mpc^3 centred on the host galaxy) volume and mass by redshift 10 could be as high as 98% and 90%, respectively. In our photon poorest model, this contribution drops to 60% and 50%. The surviving clusters in all models have a narrow average age range (mean = 13.34 Gyr, σ= 0.04 Gyr) consistent with current ages estimates of the Milky Way metal-poor globular clusters. We also test a simple dynamical destruction model and estimate that ~60% of all metal-poor globular clusters formed at high redshift have since been destroyed via tidal interactions with the host galaxy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.