Paper detail

The Inhomogeneous Ionizing Background Following Reionization

We study the spatial fluctuations in the hydrogen ionizing background in the epoch following reionization (z ~ 5--6). The rapid decrease with redshift in the photon mean free path (m.f.p.), combined with the clustering of increasingly rare ionizing sources, can result in a very inhomogenous ionizing background during this epoch. We systematically investigate the probability density functions (PDFs) and power spectra of ionizing flux, by varying several parameters such as the m.f.p., minimum halo mass capable of hosting stars, and halo duty cycle. In order to be versatile, we make use of analytic, semi-numeric and numeric approaches. Our models show that the ionizing background indeed has sizable fluctuations during this epoch sourced by the clustering of sources, with the PDFs being a factor of few wide at half of the maximum likelihood. The distributions also show marked asymmetries, with a high-value tail set by clustering on small scales, and a shorter low-value tail which is set by the mean free path. The power spectrum of the ionizing background is much more sensitive to source properties than the PDF and can be well-understood analytically with a framework similar to the halo model (usually used to describe dark matter clustering). Nevertheless, we find that Lya forest spectra are extremely insensitive to the details of the UVB, despite marked differences in the PDFs and power spectra of our various ionizing backgrounds. Assuming a uniform ionizing background only underestimates the value of the mean ionization rate inferred from the Lya forest by a few percent. Instead, analysis of the Lya forest is dominated by the uncertainties in the density field. Thus, our results justify the common assumption of a uniform ionizing background in Lya forest analysis even during this epoch.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.