Paper detail

The Information Content of Anisotropic Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Scale Measurements

Anisotropic measurements of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) feature within a galaxy survey enable joint inference about the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ and angular diameter distance $D_A(z)$. These measurements are typically obtained from moments of the measured 2-point clustering statistics, with respect to the cosine of the angle to the line of sight $μ$. The position of the BAO features in each moment depends on a combination of $D_A(z)$ and $H(z)$, and measuring the positions in two or more moments breaks this parameter degeneracy. We derive analytic formulae for the parameter combinations measured from moments given by Legendre polynomials, power laws and top-hat Wedges in $μ$, showing explicitly what is being measured by each in real-space for both the correlation function and power spectrum, and in redshift-space for the power spectrum. The large volume covered by modern galaxy samples means that the correlation function can be well approximated as having no correlations at different $μ$ on the BAO scale, and that the errors on this scale are approximately independent of $μ$. Using these approximations, we derive the information content of various moments. We show that measurements made using either the monopole and quadrupole, or the monopole and $μ^2$ power-law moment, are optimal for anisotropic BAO measurements, in that they contain all of the available information using two moments, the minimal number required to measure both $H(z)$ and $D_A(z)$. We test our predictions using 600 mock galaxy samples, matched to the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey CMASS sample, finding a good match to our analytic predictions. Our results should enable the optimal extraction of information from future galaxy surveys such as eBOSS, DESI and Euclid.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.