Paper detail

The influence of the mass-ratio on the acceleration of particles by filamentation instabilities

Almost all sources of high energy particles and photons are associated with jet phenomena. Prominent sources of such highly relativistic outflows are pulsar winds and Active Galactic Nuclei. The current understanding of these jets assumes diluted plasmas which are best described as kinetic phenomena. In this kinetic description particle acceleration to ultra-relativistic speeds can occur in completely unmagnetized and neutral plasmas through insetting effects of instabilities. Even though the morphology and nature of particle spectra are understood to a certain extent, the composition of the jets is not known yet. While Poynting-flux dominated jets are certainly composed of electron-positron plasmas, the understanding of the governing physics in AGN jets is mostly unclear. In this article we investigate how the constituting elements of an electron-positron-proton plasma behave differently under the variation of the fundamental mass-ratio m_p/m_e. We studied initially unmagnetized counterstreaming plasmas using fully relativistic three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations to investigate the influence of the mass-ratio on particle acceleration and magnetic field generation in electron-positron-proton plasmas. We covered a range of mass-ratios m_p/m_e between 1 and 100 with a particle number composition of n_{p^+}/n_{e^+} of 1 in one stream, only protons are injected in the other, whereas electrons are present in both to guarantee charge neutrality in the simulation box. We find that with increasing proton mass the instability takes longer to develop and for mass-ratios > 20 the particles seem to be accelerated in two phases which can be accounted to the individual instabilities of the different species. This means that for high mass ratios the coupling between electrons/positrons and the heavier protons, which occurs in low mass-ratios, disappears.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.