Paper detail

The Influence of Temperature Anisotropies in Controlling the Development of Magnetospheric Substorms

Ion anisotropies can affect a host of processes within the magnetosphere, from modifying the growth rate of various instabilities to the energization and mass transport within the magnetosphere. Global multi-fluid simulations using a full treatment of the pressure tensor are used to evaluate the influence of temperature anisotropies on the magnetospheric dynamics for an idealized substorm. The simulations are able to resolve the development of conics over the polar cap which eventually turn into beams in the lobes. Entry of this plasma, particularly heavy ions with high Tparallel, leads to a faster reconnection rate, additional turbulence within the reconnection region, and the substorm onset time occurs approximately 5 min earlier relative to isotropic simulations. The anisotropic treatment yields much more intense auroral currents on the nightside associated with onset and a faster expansion phase of the substorm. The plasma entering into the current sheet experiences stronger heating in the anisotropic simulations, which increases plasma transport into the equatorial dayside. Hence, the convection of the plasmasphere towards the dayside magnetosphere during the growth phase is accompanied by a relative increase in Tparallel. This leads to a very distinct temperature profile on the dayside. The injection of the energetic particles from the substorm leads to an overall increase Tperpendicular on the dayside, but only O+ reaches sufficient energies for the bulk of these ions to be able to cross noon local time during the expansion phase to participate in the formation of symmetric ring current. The net effect from these processes is to decrease the cross-polar cap potential, modify the timing of the development of reconnection and the development of the auroral currents and enhance the injection of energetic particles into the inner magnetosphere.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.