Paper detail

The influence of stellar objects mass distribution on their gravitational fields

We study the influence of the astronomical objects masses randomness on the distribution function of their gravitational fields. Based on purely theoretical arguments and comparison with extensive data, collected from observations and numerical simulations, we have shown that while mass randomness does not alter the non-Gaussian character of the gravitational fields distribution, it changes the dependencies of mean angular momenta of galaxies and clusters on their richness. The specific form of above dependence is determined by the interplay of mass distribution character and different assumptions about cluster morphology. We trace the influence of masses distribution on the time evolution of stellar objects angular momenta in CDM and $Λ$CDM models. Our theoretical predictions are in very good coincidence with the statistical results derived both from observational data and numerical simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.