Paper detail

The influence of NLTE effects in Fe I lines on an inverted atmosphere I. 6301 A and 6302 A lines formed in 1D NLTE

Ultraviolet over-ionisation of iron atoms in the solar atmosphere leads to deviations in their level populations from the Saha-Boltzmann statistics. This causes their line profiles to form in Non-Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (NLTE) conditions. While inverting such profiles to determine atmospheric parameters, the NLTE effects are often neglected and deviations from LTE are compensated for by tweaking other quantities. We investigate how the routinely employed LTE inversion of iron lines formed in NLTE under- or over-estimates atmospheric quantities such as temperature (T), line-of-sight velocity (v_LOS), magnetic field strength (B) and inclination (gamma) while the previous papers have focused mainly on T. We synthesize the Stokes profiles of Fe I 6301.5 A and 6302.5 A lines in both LTE and NLTE using a snapshot of a 3D MHD simulation. The profiles are then inverted in LTE. By considering the atmosphere inferred from inversion of LTE profiles to be the fiducial model, we compare atmosphere from the inversion of NLTE profiles with it. Any differences observed are attributed to NLTE effects. Neglecting the NLTE effects introduces errors in the inverted atmosphere. While the errors in T can go up to 13%, in v_LOS and B the errors can be as high as 50% or more. We find these errors to be present at all three inversion nodes. Importantly, they survive degradation from spatial averaging of the profiles. We give an overview of how the neglect of NLTE effects influences the values of T, v_LOS, B and gamma determined by inverting Fe I 6300 A line pair, as observed, e.g., by Hinode. Errors are found at the sites of granules, intergranular lanes, magnetic elements, basically in every region susceptible to NLTE effects. For an accurate determination of atmospheric quantities and their stratification, it is therefore important to take account of NLTE effects.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.