Paper detail

The influence of late-stage nuclear burning on red supergiant supernova light curves

Many Type II supernovae (SNe) show hot early (~30 days) emission, and a diversity in their light curves extending from the Type IIP to the Type IIL, which can be explained by interaction with dense and confined circumstellar material (CSM). We perform hydrodynamical simulations of red supergiants to model the ejection of CSM caused by wave heating during late-stage nuclear burning. Even a small amount of deposited energy ($10^{46}-10^{47}$ erg), which is roughly that expected due to waves excited by convection in the core, is sufficient to change the shapes of SN light curves and bring them into better agreement with observations. As a test case, we consider the specific example of SN 2017eaw, which shows that a nuclear burning episode is able to explain the light curve if it occurs ~150-450 days prior to core-collapse. Due to the long timescale it takes for the low energy shock to traverse the star, this would manifest as a pre-SN outburst ~50-350 days prior to the full-fledged SN. Applying work like this to other SNe will provide a direct connection between the SN and pre-SN outburst properties, which can be tested by future wide field surveys. In addition, we show that our models can qualitatively explain the short lived `flash-ionization' lines seen in the early spectra of many Type II SNe.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.