Paper detail

The influence of initial perturbation power spectra on the growth of a turbulent mixing layer induced by Richtmyer-Meshkov instability

This paper investigates the influence of different broadband perturbations on the evolution of a Richtmyer--Meshkov turbulent mixing layer initiated by a Mach 1.84 shock traversing a perturbed interface separating gases with a density ratio of 3:1. Both the bandwidth of modes in the interface perturbation, as well as their relative amplitudes, are varied in a series of carefully designed numerical simulations at grid resolutions up to $3.2\times10^9$ cells. Three different perturbations are considered, characterised by a power spectrum of the form $P(k)\propto k^m$ where $m=-1$, $-2$ and $-3$. The growth of the mixing layer is shown to strongly depend on the initial conditions, with the growth rate exponent $θ$ found to be $0.5$, $0.63$ and $0.75$ for each value of $m$ at the highest grid resolution. The asymptotic values of the molecular mixing fraction $Θ$ are also shown to vary significantly with $m$; at the latest time considered $Θ$ is $0.56$, $0.39$ and $0.20$ respectively. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) is also analysed in both the temporal and spectral domains. The temporal decay rate of TKE is found not to match the predicted value of $n=2-3θ$, which is shown to be due to a time-varying {normalised dissipation rate $C_ε$}. In spectral space, the data follow the theoretical scaling of $k^{(m+2)/2}$ at low wavenumbers and tend towards $k^{-3/2}$ and $k^{-5/3}$ scalings at high wavenumbers for the spectra of transverse and normal velocity components respectively. The results represent a significant extension of previous work on the Richtmyer--Meshkov instability evolving from broadband initial perturbations and provide useful benchmarks for future research.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.