Paper detail

The Incidence of Dwarf Novae in Large Area Transient Searches

Understanding and quantifying the contribution of known classes of transient and variable sources is an important lesson to be learned from the manifold of pre-cursors programs of the near-future large synoptic sky survey programs like SkyMapper, Pan-STARRS and LSST. With this goal in mind, we undertook photometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations of three recently reported unidentified transients. For two sources, WFI J132813.7-214237 and WFI J161953.3+031909, we show that unfortunate coincidences lead to their previous designation as transients. While the former is now interpreted as the spatial coincidence of a solar system object with faint background star, the latter is merely a cataclysmic variable unfortunately caught in and out of eclipse. The third candidate, ROTSE3 J160213.1-021311.7 is identified as an SU UMa-type dwarf novae with quiescent brightness of R~22.7 and an outburst amplitude of about 5 mag. The fourth event, SDSS-SN15207, similarly shows evidence for a dwarf nova origin. Our main conclusion is that cataclysmic variables in their various avata rs will contribute moderately to the population of transient objects.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.