Paper detail

The Imprint of Reionization on the Star Formation Histories of Dwarf Galaxies

We explore the impact of cosmic reionization on nearby isolated dwarf galaxies using a compilation of SFHs estimated from deep HST data and a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation of the Local Group. The nearby dwarfs show a wide diversity of star formation histories; from ancient systems that have largely completed their star formation $\sim 10$ Gyr ago to young dwarfs that have formed the majority of their stars in the past $\sim 5$ Gyr to two-component systems characterized by the overlap of comparable numbers of old and young stars. Taken as an ensemble, star formation in nearby dwarfs dips to lower-than-average rates at intermediate times ($4<t$/Gyr $<8$), a feature that we trace in the simulation to the effects of cosmic reionization. Reionization heats the gas and drives it out of the shallow potential wells of low mass halos, affecting especially those below a sharp mass threshold that corresponds to a virial temperature of $\sim 2 \times 10^4 $ $\mathrm{K}$ at $z_{\rm reion}$. The loss of baryons leads to a sharp decline in the star forming activity of early-collapsing systems, which, compounded by feedback from early star formation, empties halos of gas and leaves behind systems where a single old stellar component prevails. In halos below the threshold at $z_{\rm reion}$, reionization heating leads to a delay in the onset of star formation that lasts until the halo grows massive enough to allow some of the remaining gas to cool and form stars. Young stellar components therefore dominate in dwarfs whose halos assemble late and thus form few stars before reionization. Two-component systems may be traced to late mergers of individual examples of the two aforementioned cases. The relative dearth of intermediate-age stars in nearby dwarfs might thus be the clearest signature yet identified of the imprint of cosmic reionization on the star formation history of dwarf galaxies.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.