Paper detail

The imprint of $f(R)$ gravity on weak gravitational lensing I: Connection between observables and large scale structure

We study the effect of $f(R)$ gravity on the statistical properties of various large-scale structures which can be probed in weak gravitational lensing measurements. A set of ray-tracing simulations of gravitational lensing in $f(R)$ gravity enables us to explore cosmological information on (i) stacking analyses of weak lensing observables and (ii) peak statistics in reconstructed lensing mass maps. For the $f(R)$ model proposed by Hu \& Sawicki, the measured lensing signals of dark matter haloes in the stacking analysis would show a $\simlt10\%$ difference between the standard $Λ$CDM and the $f(R)$ model when the additional degree of freedom in $f(R)$ model would be $|f_{\rm R0}|\sim10^{-5}$. Among various large-scale structures to be studied in stacking analysis, troughs, i.e, underdensity regions in projected plane of foreground massive haloes, could be promising to constrain the model with $|f_{\rm R0}|\sim10^{-5}$, while stacking analysis around voids is found to be difficult to improve the constraint of $|f_{\rm R0}|$ even in future lensing surveys with a sky coverage of $\sim1000$ square degrees. On the peak statistics, we confirm the correspondence between local maxima and dark matter haloes along the line of sight, regardless of the modification of gravity in our simulation. Thus, the number count of high significance local maxima would be useful to probe the mass function of dark matter haloes even in the $f(R)$ model with $|f_{\rm R0}|\simlt10^{-5}$. We also find that including local minima in lensing mass maps would be helpful to improve the constant on $f(R)$ gravity down to $|f_{\rm R0}|=10^{-5}$ in ongoing weak lensing surveys.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.