Paper detail

The imprint of dissipation on the shapes of merger remnant LOSVDs

The properties of elliptical galaxies are broadly consistent with simulated remnants of gas-rich mergers between spirals, motivating more detailed studies of the imprint of this formation mechanism on the remnant distribution function. Gas has a strong impact on the non-Gaussian shapes of the line-of-sight velocity distributions (LOSVDs) of the merger remnant, owing to the embedded disk that forms out of the gas that retains its angular momentum during the merger, and the strong central mass concentration from the gas that falls to the center. The deviations from Gaussianity are parametrized by the Gauss-Hermite moments h_3 and h_4, which are related to the skewness and kurtosis of the LOSVDs. We quantify the dependence of the (h_3,h_4)-v/sigma relations on the initial gas fraction of the progenitor disks in 1:1 mergers, using Gadget-2 simulations including star formation, radiative cooling, and feedback from supernovae and AGN. For gas fractions f_gas < ~15% the overall correlation between h_3 and v/sigma is weak, consisting of a flat negatively correlated component arising from edge-on viewing angles plus a steep positively correlated part from face-on projections. The spread in v/sigma values decreases toward high positive h_4, and there is a trend toward lower h_4 as the gas fraction increases from 0 to 15%. For f_gas > ~20% the (h_3,4)- v/sigma distributions look quite different - there is a tight negative h_3- v/sigma correlation, and a wide spread in v/sigma values at all h_4, in better agreement with observations. Re-mergers of the high-f_gas remnants (dry mergers) produce slowly rotating systems with nearly Gaussian LOSVDs. We explain all of these trends in terms of the underlying orbit structure of the remnants, as molded by their dissipative formation histories.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.