Paper detail

The importance of galaxy interactions in triggering type II quasar activity

We present deep Gemini GMOS-S optical broad-band images for a complete sample of 20 SDSS selected type II quasars with redshifts 0.3 < z < 0.41 and [OIII] emission line luminosities greater than 10^8.5 solar luminosities. We use these images to determine the significance of galaxy interactions in triggering nuclear activity, finding that 15 (75%) show evidence for interaction in the form of tails, shells, double nuclei etc. The median surface brightness of the features is 23.4 mag arcsec sq and the range is 20.9-24.7 mag arcsec sq. We find a similar rate of interaction in the type II quasars as in a comparison sample of quiescent early-type galaxies at similar redshift (67 +/- 14%). However the surface brightness of the detected features is up to 2 magnitudes brighter for the type II quasars than for the quiescent early-types, which have surface brightnesses in the range 22.1-26.1 mag arcsec sq and a median surface brightness 24.3 mag arcsec sq. This may indicate that the mergers witnessed in the comparison sample galaxies could have different progenitors, or we may be viewing the interactions at different stages. We also compare our results with a sample of radio-loud AGN and find a higher rate of interaction signatures (95 +/- 21%) than in the type II quasars, but a very similar range of surface brightnesses for the morphological features (20.9-24.8 mag arcsec sq), possibly indicating a similarity in the types of triggering interactions. The range of features detected in the type II quasars suggests that AGN activity can be triggered before, during or after the coalescence of the black holes. Overall, our results are consistent with the idea that galaxy interaction plays an important role in the triggering of quasar activity.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.