Paper detail

The importance of bubble deformability for strong drag reduction in bubbly turbulent Taylor-Couette flow

Bubbly turbulent Taylor-Couette (TC) flow is globally and locally studied at Reynolds numbers of Re = 5 x 10^5 to 2 x 10^6 with a stationary outer cylinder and a mean bubble diameter around 1 mm. We measure the drag reduction (DR) based on the global dimensional torque as a function of the global gas volume fraction a_global over the range 0% to 4%. We observe a moderate DR of up to 7% for Re = 5.1 x 10^5. Significantly stronger DR is achieved for Re = 1.0 x 10^6 and 2.0 x 10^6 with, remarkably, more than 40% of DR at Re = 2.0 x 10^6 and a_global = 4%. To shed light on the two apparently different regimes of moderate DR and strong DR, we investigate the local liquid flow velocity and the local bubble statistics, in particular the radial gas concentration profiles and the bubble size distribution, for the two different cases; Re = 5.1 x 10^5 in the moderate DR regime and Re = 1.0 x 10^6 in the strong DR regime, both at a_global = 3 +/- 0.5%. By defining and measuring a local bubble Weber number (We) in the TC gap close to the IC wall, we observe that the crossover from the moderate to the strong DR regime occurs roughly at the crossover of We ~ 1. In the strong DR regime at Re = 1.0 x 10^6 we find We > 1, reaching a value of 9 (+7, -2) when approaching the inner wall, indicating that the bubbles increasingly deform as they draw near the inner wall. In the moderate DR regime at Re = 5.1 x 10^5 we find We ~ 1, indicating more rigid bubbles, even though the mean bubble diameter is larger, namely 1.2 (+0.7, -0.1) mm, as compared to the Re = 1.0 x 10^6 case, where it is 0.9 (+0.6, -0.1) mm. We conclude that bubble deformability is a relevant mechanism behind the observed strong DR. These local results match and extend the conclusions from the global flow experiments as found by van den Berg et al. (2005) and from the numerical simulations by Lu, Fernandez & Tryggvason (2005).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.