Paper detail

The imperative to reduce carbon emissions in astronomy

For astronomers to make a significant contribution to the reduction of climate change-inducing greenhouse gas emissions, we first must quantify our sources of emissions and review the most effective approaches for reducing them. Here we estimate that Australian astronomers' total greenhouse gas emissions from their regular work activities are $\gtrsim$25 ktCO$_2$-e/yr (equivalent kilotonnes of carbon dioxide per year). This can be broken into $\sim$15 ktCO$_2$-e/yr from supercomputer usage, $\sim$4.2 ktCO$_2$-e/yr from flights (where individuals' flight emissions correlate with seniority), $>$3.3 ktCO$_2$-e/yr from the operation of observatories, and 2.6$\pm$0.4 ktCO$_2$-e/yr from powering office buildings. Split across faculty scientists, postdoctoral researchers, and PhD students, this averages to $\gtrsim$37 tCO$_2$-e/yr per astronomer, over 40% more than what the average Australian non-dependant emits in total, equivalent to $\sim$5$\times$ the global average. To combat these environmentally unsustainable practices, we suggest astronomers should strongly preference use of supercomputers, observatories, and office spaces that are predominantly powered by renewable energy sources. Where facilities that we currently use do not meet this requirement, their funders should be lobbied to invest in renewables, such as solar or wind farms. Air travel should also be reduced wherever possible, replaced primarily by video conferencing, which should also promote inclusivity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.