Paper detail

The Impact of Wind Scalings on Stellar Growth and the Baryon Cycle in Cosmological Simulations

Many phenomenologically successful cosmological galaxy formation simulations employ kinetic winds to model galactic outflows, a crucial ingredient in obtaining predictions that agree with various observations. Yet systematic studies of how variations in kinetic wind scalings might alter observable galaxy properties are rare. Here we employ GADGET-3 simulations to study how the baryon cycle, stellar mass function, and other galaxy and CGM predictions vary as a function of the assumed outflow speed $v_w$ and the scaling of the mass loading factor $η$ with velocity dispersion $σ$. We design our fiducial model to reproduce the measured wind properties at 25% of the virial radius from the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) simulations. We find that a strong dependence of $η\sim σ^5$ in low mass haloes with $σ< 106\ \mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$ is required to match the faint end of the stellar mass functions at $z > 1$. The wind speed also has a major impact, with faster winds significantly reducing wind recycling and heating more halo gas. Both effects result in less stellar mass growth in massive haloes and impact high ionization absorption in halo gas. We cannot simultaneously match the stellar content at $z=2$ and $z=0$ within a single model, suggesting that an additional feedback source such as AGN might be required in massive galaxies at lower redshifts, but the amount needed depends strongly on assumptions regarding the outflow properties. We run a 50 $\mathrm{Mpc/h}$, $2\times576^3$ simulation with our fiducial parameters and show that it matches a range of star-forming galaxy properties at $z\sim0-2$. In closing, the results from simulations of galaxy formation are much more sensitive to small changes in the feedback implementation than to the hydrodynamic technique.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.