Paper detail

The impact of two non-transiting planets and stellar activity on mass determinations for the super-Earth CoRoT-7b

CoRoT-7 is an active star, whose orbiting planets and their masses have been under debate since their initial detection. In the previous studies, CoRoT-7 was found to have two planets, CoRoT-7b and CoRoT-7c with orbital periods of 0.85 and 3.69 days, and a potential third planet with a period of $\sim$9 days. The existence of the third planet has been questioned as potentially being an activity-induced artefact. Mass of the transiting planet CoRoT-7b has been estimated to have widely different values owing to the activity level of the parent star, the consequent Radial Velocity (RV) 'jitter', and the methods used to rectify this ambiguity. Here we present an analysis of the HARPS archival RV data of CoRoT-7 using a new wavelength-domain technique, scalpels, to correct for the stellar activity-induced spectral line-shape changes. Simultaneous modelling of stellar activity and orbital motions, identified using the l1- periodogram, shows that scalpels effectively reduce the contribution of stellar variability to the RV signal and enhance the detectability of exoplanets around active stars. Using kima nested-sampling package, we modelled the system incorporating a Gaussian Process together with scalpels. The resultant posterior distributions favoured a three-planet system comprising two non-transiting planets, CoRoT-7c and CoRoT-7d with orbital periods of 3.697$\pm$0.005 and 8.966$\pm$1.546 days, in addition to the known transiting planet. The transiting planet CoRoT-7b is found to be a rocky super-Earth with a mass of $M_{b}$=6.06$\pm$0.65 $M_{\oplus}$. The determined masses of $M_{c}$=13.29$\pm$0.69 $M_{\oplus}$ and $M_{d}$=17.14$\pm$2.55 $M_{\oplus}$ suggest the non-transiting planets CoRoT-7c and CoRoT-7d to be structurally similar to Uranus and Neptune.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.