Paper detail

The Impact of Smartphone Apps on Bike Sharing Systems

Bike-sharing systems are exploding in cities around the world as more people are adopting sustainable transportation solutions for their everyday commutes. However, as more people use the system, riders often encounter that bikes or docks might not be available when they arrive to a station. As a result, many systems like CitiBike and Divvy provide riders with information about the network via smartphone apps so that riders can find stations with available bikes. However, not all customers have adopted the use of these smartphone apps for their station selection. By combining customer choice modeling and finite capacity queueing models, we explore the impact of the smartphone app technology to increase throughput and reduce blocking in bike sharing systems. To this end, we prove a mean-field limit and a central limit theorem for an empirical process of the number of stations with $k$ bikes. We also prove limit theorems for a new process called the ratio process, which characterizes the proportion of stations whose bike availability ratio lies within a particular partition of the interval [0,1]. For the mean field limit, we prove that the equilibrium exists, is unique, and that the stationary distribution of the empirical measure converges to a Dirac mass at the same equilibrium, thus showing an interchange of limits result ($\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty}\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}=\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty}$). Our limit theorems provide insight on the mean, variance, and sample path dynamics of large scale bike-sharing systems. Our results illustrate that if we increase the proportion of customers that use smartphone app information, the entropy of the bike sharing network is reduced, and riders experience less blocking in the network.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.