Paper detail

The Impact of Renewable Energy Communities in the Italian Day-Ahead Electricity Market: A Scenario Analysis

This paper evaluates the economic impact of Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) on the Italian wholesale power market. Combining a bottom-up engineering approach with a short-run economic impact assessment, the study begins by mapping existing and emerging RECs in Italy. We identify key characteristics of RECs, such as average installed capacity, institutional profiles of members, types of renewable systems used, and transmission across Italy's electricity market zones. This mapping yields representative REC configurations, which are employed within a bottom-up engineering model to generate energy injection and self-consumption profiles for different REC prosumer and producer categories (residential, public, small and medium enterprise, non-profit organization, and standalone installation), considering the different levels of solar irradiance in Italy based on latitude. These zonal results, aggregated on an hourly basis, inform the implementation of the synthetic counterfactual approach, which develops alternative scenarios (e.g., 5 GW target for REC-driven capacity set by Italian policy for 2027) to assess the impact of REC-driven injection and self-consumption on the Italian day-ahead power market. The findings suggest that REC deployment can increase equilibrium quantities during daylight in most of the time, while decreasing equilibrium quantities mostly during the cold months, as electrified heating drives greater self-consumption and offsets lower grid injections. Both positive and negative effects on equilibrium quantities suggest that REC deployment also has a potential to reduce wholesale electricity prices. Moreover, by reducing grid exchanges through higher self-consumption, REC proliferation can alleviate pressure on the distribution system.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.