Paper detail

The Impact of Realistic Foreground and Instrument Models on 21cm Epoch of Reionization Experiments

Predictions for the ability of 21-cm interferometric experiments to discriminate Epoch of Reionization (EoR) signal models are typically limited by the simplicity of data models, whereby foreground signals and characteristics of the instrument are often simplified or neglected.To move towards more realistic scenarios, we explore the effects of applying more realistic foreground and instrument models to the 21cm signal, and the ability to estimate astrophysical parameters with these additional complexities. We use a highly-optimized version of \textsc{21cmFAST}, integrated into \textsc{21cmMC}, to generate lightcones of the brightness temperature fluctuation for Bayesian parameter estimation. We include a statistical point-source foreground model and an instrument model based on the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) scaled in observation time to have an effective sensitivity similar to the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA). We also extend the current likelihood prescription to account for the presence of beam convolution and foregrounds, the 2-Dimensional Power Spectrum (PS), and the correlation of PS modes. We use frequency bands between 150 and 180 MHz to constrain the ionizing efficiency ($ζ$), the minimum virial temperature of halos ($T_{\mathrm{vir}}$), the soft X-ray emissivity per unit Star Formation Rate (SFR) ($L_X/SFR$ ), and the X-ray energy threshold ($E_0$). We find that the inclusion of realistic foregrounds and instrumental components biases the parameter constraints due to unaccounted for cross-power between the EoR signal, foregrounds and thermal noise. This causes estimates of $ζ$ to be biased by up to $5σ$ but the estimates of $T_{vir}$, L$_X$/SFR and E$_0$ remain unaffected and are all within $1σ$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.